by Michael Strato
28 March 2006

| | ||
| Pip: 194 | ||
| 9 point match Green-White: Score 2-0 | ||
| Pip: 104 | ||
| | ||
| Pip: 196 | ||
| 5 point match Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 172 | ||
| | ||
| Pip: 99 | ||
| 5 point match Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 30 | ||
| | ||
| Pip: 194 | ||
| 9 point match Green-White: Score 2-0 | ||
| Pip: 104 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | R | 18/2* | 1.683 | |
| 8.0% 75.1% 88.2% 11.8% 1.2% 0.0% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.581 ±0.036. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 3267 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 2 | R | 18/10 7/3 6/2* | 1.674 (-0.009) | |
| 9.5% 76.5% 87.7% 12.3% 2.6% 0.2% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.586 ±0.043. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 2856 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 3 | R | 18/14 13/9 7/3 6/2* | 1.674 (-0.010) | |
| 8.9% 75.7% 87.2% 12.8% 1.0% 0.1% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.578 ±0.038. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 2482 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 4 | R | 18/10 13/9 6/2* | 1.655 (-0.028) | |
| 8.9% 73.7% 87.4% 12.6% 1.7% 0.1% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.556 ±0.038. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 3052 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 5 | R | 18/14 6/2*(3) | 1.623 (-0.061) | |
| 7.3% 74.9% 86.0% 14.0% 1.7% 0.2% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.522 ±0.045. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 3571 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| | ||
| Pip: 196 | ||
| 5 point match Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 172 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | R | 23/18* 10/9 | 0.906 | |
| 7.1% 43.2% 72.3% 27.7% 4.2% 0.3% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.903 ±0.057. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 1623 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 2 | R | 23/18*/17 | 0.876 (-0.029) | |
| 6.5% 43.7% 71.3% 28.7% 4.4% 0.3% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.880 ±0.058. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 2094 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 3 | R | 9/3* | 0.858 (-0.048) | |
| 8.4% 41.6% 70.5% 29.5% 5.3% 0.2% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.855 ±0.049. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 2442 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 4 | R | 23/18* 9/8 | 0.838 (-0.068) | |
| 6.4% 41.3% 70.6% 29.4% 4.3% 0.1% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.846 ±0.060. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 1707 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 5 | R | 23/18* 22/21 | 0.825 (-0.080) | |
| 7.1% 42.3% 70.2% 29.8% 5.1% 0.3% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.844 ±0.050. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 3321 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 6 | R | 24/18* | 0.780 (-0.126) | |
| 7.3% 38.8% 69.2% 30.8% 4.5% 0.3% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 0.798 ±0.056. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 144 games (equiv. 1813 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| | ||
| Pip: 99 | ||
| 5 point match Green-White: Score 0-0 | ||
| Pip: 30 | ||
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
| 1 | R | 17/9 | 1.313 | |
| 0.2% 38.0% 91.7% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.217 ±0.009. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 576 games (equiv. 21972 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
| 2 | R | 17/11 3/1 | 1.230 (-0.083) | |
| 0.2% 33.5% 90.8% 9.2% 0.0% 0.0% | ||||
| 95% confidence interval: - money cubeless eq.: 1.153 ±0.009. Rollout settings: Full rollout, 576 games (equiv. 21060 games), played 3-ply (precise), random seed, with race database. | ||||
1.) 18/2* 2.) 9/3* Keep the blitz going, don't allow that anchor on the three-point. 3.) 17/9 I thought this would be a trade-off for leaving more shots vs. being closer to home, but it seems that 17/9 is better both ways.
#1) 44:6/2(3) 18/14 #2) 51:23/18 22/21 #3) 62:17/11 11/9 , sometimes you have to risk big to win big
1)18-2 2)23-18,22-21 3)17-11,3-1
1) 18/2*. with so many on the 7 and 8 and the 2 stragglers it doesnt seem right to switch points.
2) 23/18*, 9/8. priming, not blitzing.
3) 17/8. As FDR points out it less shots AND closer to home.
I think another play needs to be rolled out for #1: 44: 6/2(2) 13/9 7/3
All of the current choices either leave a blot on the 2 point or put 3 men there. I would rather not let him make the 2 pt by gaining time with a hit there, but take the chance on the 6 point.
You must be signed in to post comments.

