By Steve Sax: Steve Sax provides interesting backgammon positions and commentary on a hard-fought backgammon match against Neil Kazaross during the recent Michigan Summer Championships.
Back to GammonVillage Home Page

Tournament Backgammon Set
Regular Price:   $99.95
Feature Price:   $74.95
FREE SHIPPING
Log In
Retrieve Password
Log In
Password
    21 Nov 2008
About UsContact UsMake GammonVillage My Home PageAdvertise On GammonVillageBecome A GammonVillage Affiliate
Join The GammonVillage Affiliate Program
View All Banners

  Steve Sax
 
Steve Sax
Backgammon Kaz and Effect
by Steve Sax
20 July 2008 Back to ADVANCED ANGLES

When you play well you rate to win. That is cause and effect in backgammon and other contests of skill.

Well it had been just shy of three years since Neil Kazaross had won an American Backgammon Tour (ABT) event so the premise set forth in the first line of this article seemed to be betraying the all time ABT points leader.

It's not that Neil wasn't playing well, but he just wasn't scoring those points like he had in 1994, 1999, and 2005 when he won the ABT crown for the third time and mind you, no one else has even won it twice.
 
The rest of this article (80.20 K) is premium content.


GammonVillage Subscriptions:

Choose a subscription length. Your best value is the lifetime subscription.

Duration:Price:
Expires:
3 Month Subscription$30
21 Feb 2009
1 Year Subscription$50
21 Nov 2009
Lifetime Subscription$125
Never

We accept Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover Card and PayPal. Google Checkout available.

Article text Copyright © 1999-2008 Steve Sax and GammonVillage Inc.
Feedback about this article:

2.
Subject:  Re: Backgammon Kaz and Effect
From: 
Fabrice Liardet
Date:  25 Jul 2008 06:29 EST

Yes, that is exactly what I thought - actually position 11 looked easy to me while I failed on almost the half of the other decisions. For a successful containment, using all 15 checkers is no luxury, and after 8/4(2) it is likely that 2 of the 3 spares on the 6 will stay out of play as long as the 3-point is too deep.

3.
Subject:  Re: Backgammon Kaz and Effect
From: 
Mary Hickey   Member has a photo available
Date:  29 Jul 2008 11:38 EST

Regarding Position 11, I agree with the reason Naz and Fabrice give regarding the difficulty of making the 5 point later, and also with Steve's dislike of the gappiness resulting from making the 4 point now. We can see whether this reasoning holds water by changing the position so that we can make the 5 point right now, though not with the checkers we wanted (from the 6 point). We then avoid the gappiness, and of course solve the problem of how to make it later >>

I altered the position by switching the number of Green checkers on the 22 and 21 points, and making the roll 33 instead of 44. Snowie 4's 3-ply evaluation then prefers making the 22 and 5 points over the 22 and 10 by .094, showing that these reasons probably are the right ones. (And, as is often but not always the case, that "the 5 point is the 5 point.")

 

You must be signed in to post comments.

 

Copyright © 1999-2008 GammonVillage Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or comments? Send an email to webmaster@gammonvillage.com.

Contact Us    
About Us    
Advertise    
Site Map    
Stay Up-To-Date with GammonVillage using your RSS aggregator