Thanks Douglas, I have accumulated many of the MET's that have been published, including Snowie's 2 decimal version, Woolsey, Kleinman, Ortega-Kleinman, Strommen, Trice-Jacobs (unadjusted for the good tasting fish), Modified-Janowski, and Zadeh's1977. I use them with DoubleTakeCalculator (DTC) a piece of software that David Hart created using Kit's "Tournament Backgammon" as the model. The software accepts any MET and produces the Take-Point and Window for all the various scores and cube-sizes. It also let's you import Jellyfish data, or manually input the rollout stats (wins,G's,BG's)from any of the bots to see whether it was a DOUBLE/Redouble/Take/Drop.

I have always wanted to know how much difference there is between using one MET vs another. I am so glad that you gave us this article, because "over the table" I am not capable of using a table that uses decimal point(s) data. And only commiserate with myself (post match) when I find that Snowie would have doubled but using Woolsey I did not (or vice versa). It is nice to know that very LITTLE equity is lost between tables and read that Gammon-Go and Gammon-Save are better carried out by the trailer, than by the leader. (I will email you a screen-shot of DTC just to give you an idea of its design.)