Irrelevant Alternatives

by Douglas Zare
1 May 2013


Douglas Zare

Classical economics describes backgammon bots much better than it describes how people make decisions. In classical economics, agents consider all possibilities, and choose the option with the highest evaluation. That's very similar to the way backgammon bots choose plays.

Behavioral economists study ways that people differ from the classical model. For example, a rational agent should ignore irrelevant alternatives. If you choose A over B, then adding a third alternative C shouldn't make you prefer B over A. If your evaluation of A is higher than your evaluation of B, this relationship doesn't change when you also evaluate a weaker play C. However, people don't evaluate positions by comparing absolute numerical evaluations. People usually compare positions qualitatively. When there is a tough choice between quite different positions, you might be able to switch people's preferences by showing them a third option.
 

The rest of this article (7.30 K) is premium content. Please subscribe below.

GammonVillage Subscriptions:

Choose a subscription length. Your best value is the lifetime subscription.

Duration:
Price:
Expires:
3 Month Subscription
$30
17 Mar 2019
1 Year Subscription
$50
17 Dec 2019
Lifetime Subscription
$125
Never

Proceed to Step Two

We accept Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover Card and PayPal. Google Wallet available.

Article text Copyright © 1999-2018 Douglas Zare and GammonVillage Inc.

 
You must be signed in to rate articles.
List Price: $325.00Sale Price: $265.00
Join the Gammon Village Store Affiliate Program today.
Help Wanted
Backgammon Board Game Cartoon
Social Networking
Become a Fan on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter

Follow Us
U.S. Backgammon Federation
USBGF.org
The U.S. Backgammon Federation
Terms & Conditions I Privacy Policy I About Us I Contact Us I Advertise I Affiliates I Site Map